Q-Hub
£245/month
Essentials — up to 3 full and 50 basic users
- Implementation included — no setup fee
- Live in about four weeks
- 30-day trial, no card
Comparison
Q-Hub vs Mango
Mango is the closest comparison on this site. It is QHSE software, it names ISO 9001, 45001 and 14001, and its module list overlaps ours heavily. There is no capability argument to make here, so this page does not pretend there is one.
Mango is a trademark of its owner. Shown here to identify the product being compared; Q-Hub is not affiliated with or endorsed by them.
Compliance Report · Q1 2026Export PDF
Compliance 94% +3.2
Open NCRs 12 -5
On-time close 88% +6.1
Overdue 3 -2
Compliance trend
Compliance by site
The short answer
Read this and you may not need the rest of the page.
Choose Mango if…
You need HR, management of change, or food safety as modules — or you are certifying to ISO 27001 or ISO 22301. They have all of it and we do not.
Choose Q-Hub if…
You want the price before the call, implementation included, and a 30-day trial rather than a demo. On the QHSE core the two are close, so buy on the commercial terms.
Choose neither if…
You only need mobile inspections. Both of us are heavier than that, and a specialist inspection app will be quicker and cheaper.
At a glance
Every row is checkable. The Mango column reflects what they publish on their own homepage. Source: mangolive.com, read 21 September 2026.
Scroll to compare
| Feature | Mango | Q-Hub |
|---|---|---|
| What each covers | ||
Built for EvidenceMango describes itself as "Reduce paperwork, save time and be compliant with QHSE software". On scope the two are directly comparable. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | QHSE — the same four letters | QHSE |
ISO 9001, 45001 and 14001 EvidenceTheir homepage names ISO 9001, ISO 45001 and ISO 14001, alongside ISO 22000, ISO 27001 and ISO 22301. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — all three named | Yes — all three |
| Document management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audits and inspections | ✓ | ✓ |
| Incident reporting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Risk management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Supplier management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Environmental management | ✓ | ✓ |
| Training / eLearning | ✓ | ✓ |
Maintenance and plant & equipment EvidenceTheir homepage names "Maintenance" and "Plant & Equipment" as modules. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — named modules | Yes — asset register with calibration and maintenance scheduling |
| Commercials | ||
| Published pricing | Not published | Yes — from £85/month |
Free trial EvidenceTheir homepage offers a free demo. A free trial is not offered. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Demo only | 30 days, no card |
Implementation EvidenceTheir homepage makes no statement about implementation or setup fees. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Not stated | Included with every subscription |
| Where they go further | ||
Human resources EvidenceTheir homepage names "Human Resources" as a module. Q-Hub does not offer HR. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — named module | No — not offered |
Management of change EvidenceTheir homepage names "Management of Change". Q-Hub does not offer it as a module. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — named module | No — not offered |
Food safety EvidenceTheir homepage names "Food Safety/Incident" and ISO 22000. Q-Hub does not offer food safety as a module. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — ISO 22000 and a food safety module | No — not offered as a module |
ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 EvidenceTheir homepage names ISO 27001 and ISO 22301. Q-Hub does not cover information security or business continuity standards. Source · checked 2026-09-21 | Yes — both named | No — not covered |
Competitor pricing as published by each vendor. Figures marked ≈ are converted from the currency they were published in at today’s rate, for comparison only.
Competitor details read from their own published materials, last checked 2026-09-21.
Where Q-Hub is the better choice
Each one checkable against their own published material.
£85 a month, published
You can see the price before you speak to anyone
- Mango
- Not published
- Q-Hub
- Yes — from £85/month
No pricing figures appear on Mango’s homepage. Q-Hub publishes £85, £245 and £530 a month. When two products are this close on capability, the one you can price without a conversation is the easier business case.
You can try it, not just watch it
- Mango
- Demo only
- Q-Hub
- 30 days, no card
Mango offers a free demo. Q-Hub offers a 30-day trial with no credit card. A demo shows you what someone else can do with the software; a trial shows you what your own team will do with it.
Implementation is included, not quoted
- Mango
- Not stated
- Q-Hub
- Included with every subscription
Their homepage makes no statement about implementation or setup fees. Q-Hub includes discovery, configuration, data migration and role-based training with every subscription. Four weeks is the standard timeline.
Document control, version by version
Both platforms do this. It is here so you can see the shape of it — version history, approval routing and sign-off — and judge it against what Mango shows you in their demo rather than take either of our words for it.
SOP-042 Quality Manual.pdf Approved Read & Understood 278/280
Version history
v3.0 Approved 28 Feb 2026
Annual review — updated Section 4.2 management responsibilities
v2.1 Archived 15 Sep 2025
Minor correction to Appendix C references
v2.0 Archived 02 Mar 2025
Full revision for ISO 9001:2015 transition
Where Mango is the better choice
Cases where we would tell you to choose them, because a comparison page that never concedes is not worth reading.
You need HR in the same system
- Mango
- Yes — named module
- Q-Hub
- No — not offered
Mango names Human Resources as a module. Q-Hub does not offer it. If you want quality and people in one system, they have the broader footprint.
You need management of change
- Mango
- Yes — named module
- Q-Hub
- No — not offered
Their homepage names Management of Change. Q-Hub does not offer it as a module.
You certify to ISO 27001 or 22301
- Mango
- Yes — both named
- Q-Hub
- No — not covered
Mango names ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 alongside the QHSE standards, and ISO 22000 for food. Q-Hub covers 9001, 45001 and 14001 and does not claim the others.
What you would actually pay
Set your team size and see the Q-Hub price. Mango does not publish figures, so nothing on their side is estimated — their column quotes their own pricing page.
Mango
Not published
Published pricing is not available, so the figure depends on a quote.
- Implementation: Not stated
- Free trial: Demo only
Q-Hub figures are our published prices. Mango does not publish prices, so nothing is estimated on their side — their column quotes their own pricing page, read 2026-09-21.
Feature deep-dive
Mango is the closest comparison anywhere on this site. The same four letters, all three ISO standards named, and the same core modules — documents, audits and inspections, incidents, risk, suppliers, environmental management and training.
On breadth they go further than we do. A human resources module, management of change, food safety with ISO 22000, and both ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 are named capabilities that Q-Hub does not offer. If any of them is on your requirements list, Mango covers ground we do not.
Where Q-Hub differs is commercial rather than functional. The price is published, implementation is included in the subscription rather than quoted separately, and you get a 30-day trial rather than a guided demo. On capability this is close. On what you can find out before you talk to a salesperson, it is not.
- Published pricing from £85/month
- Implementation included with every subscription
- 30-day free trial rather than a demo
- UK-based support with no ticket limits or premium tier
NCR Corrective Action · workflowLive
Auto-escalation · overdue > 24h → Head of QHSE
Switching from Mango
What a move actually involves.
What comes across
Documents, training records, audit history, incidents, risk assessments and supplier data, mapped with your team rather than flattened into one library.
What stays behind
HR records and maintenance schedules, if you use those modules. We do not hold them, and it is better to plan for that than discover it mid-migration.
Run both for a while
Two to four weeks in parallel before the old system is switched off.
What we cannot promise
We have not migrated a Mango tenant end to end and will not pretend otherwise. Bring your export format to the call.
Trusted by compliance teams worldwide
“
“Qhub provides a visible, intuitive way to manage data and workflows, revolutionising our approach to operations”
Fowlers of Bristol (Engineers) Ltd
Operations director
“
“Qhub helps us to... proactively use our QMS... and increase efficiency”
Anglia Cathodic Protection Services
Business manager
“
“Really made a difference with providing compliance during audits – both regulatory, customer, and internal.”
Auxitrol Weston
Quality manager
“
“QHub has supported us in achieving a higher compliance rate.”
BMC Analysis
Technical Manager/ Quality Manage
“
“We can't believe how fast we were able to get it up and running.”
Cawood Group
“
“Managing NCRs are now so much easier”
Enviromesh
Quality manager
“
“Where was this 2 years ago... we're blown away”
Jaltek
Compliance manager for Jaltek
“
“Qhub has improved our safety management system no end, making it very efficient”
Rocal Endurance Doors
Compliance manager
“
“We use it for as much as possible.”
Scottish Leather Group
Compliance manager
Integrations
Connects with the tools you already use
Q-Hub connects to your existing tools via REST API, webhooks and SSO, with bespoke connectors on request. More integrations coming soon.
Microsoft 365
SharePoint
Teams
Slack
Google Workspace
Power BI
Jira
SAP
Salesforce
Enterprise Security
Your data is safe with us
Each certification and commitment, with the detail behind it.
ISO 27001 Independently audited information security management, certified to ISO/IEC 27001.
Cyber Essentials UK Government-backed certification against the most common cyber attacks.
GDPR Compliant Full compliance with UK & EU data protection law.
99.9% Uptime SLA Guaranteed platform availability, backed by our SLA.
UK Data Centres All customer data hosted in ISO 27001-certified UK data centres.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Not on capability — that would be an easy claim to disprove, and their module list is broader than ours. Mango adds HR, maintenance, management of change, food safety and ISO 27001/22301. Q-Hub is the better choice if you want a published price, an included implementation and a real trial.
Human Resources, Maintenance, Plant & Equipment, Management of Change and Food Safety as modules, plus ISO 27001 and ISO 22301 coverage. All five are named on their homepage.
Published pricing, implementation included in the subscription, and a 30-day free trial rather than a demo. On the QHSE core the two are closely matched.
They do not publish figures. Q-Hub publishes £85, £245 and £530 a month with implementation included.
Yes, 30 days with no credit card. Mango offers a free demo rather than a trial.
Four weeks is standard, including data migration and role-based training. Larger rollouts run six to eight.
Yes — the three standards share a harmonised ten-clause structure, which is why BSI, the UK national standards body, runs them as a single integrated management system: “an integrated management system for ISO 9001, ISO 14001 and ISO 45001”. Q-Hub runs all three as one audit programme, so a finding closes once against whichever standard it belongs to instead of being re-entered somewhere else. Mango names all three as well, so on this particular question the two are level and the difference between them is commercial.
Closely matched, so compare the terms
The capability overlap is real and we have said so. The published price, the included implementation and the 30-day trial are where we differ — try it without a conversation.
Start free trialNo credit card required · 30-day free trial · Live in 4 weeks